The AJC alerts us to 3 vintage sales happening around Atlanta.
One of the sales will take place later this month in front of the Decatur High School, sponsored by www.therevivalofvintage.com:
"10 a.m.-5 p.m. Sept. 27-28 in front of Decatur High School, 310 N. McDonough St., Decatur. Free. (Free parking at DeKalb County Courthouse deck at East Trinity Place at Commerce Drive.)
The Country Living Fair is one of three national shows, attracting 150-plus vendors from across the country, organized by the home design magazine that moved this year from New York to Birmingham, Ala. The sprawling outdoor marketplace offers a wide range of treasures: shabby chic decor, architectural elements, jewelry and clothing, primitives, garden pieces and folk art and crafts." Read the rest @ AJC
Row Of Links Below Banner
Friday, September 19, 2014
WABE on annexation
![]() |
| via http://www.decaturga.com/Modules/ShowDocument.aspdocumentid=5373 Red/pinkish areas labeled A-D denote areas Decatur wants to annex; yellow/orangeish areas are in Avondale Estates' annexation plan. Medlock neighborhood labeled in yellow. |
“If they’re shopping in that shopping center, then and that shopping center is going into a city, then they should go into that city,” says Allen Venet. He heads the City of Briarcliff Initiative, which is now working with the Lakeside group to draw borders for a new city that will likely touch Decatur.
“We hope to be able to draw our map in a way that complements them as best as we can,” Venet told WABE. “That may not be exactly agreeing with them. We may think that, if they take certain areas, they should go beyond and take some more people, but we’re still working on that.” Read on or listen @ WABE
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Notes from MANA community meeting with Councilman Alex Wan, Atlanta District 6
MANA community meeting with Councilman Alex Wan, Atlanta District 6, September 17, 2014
Announcements by Lynn Ganim, acting MANA president:
This meeting is part of a series of meetings where MANA is reaching out to public officials to better understand how our neighborhood may be impacted by annexations or by new cities that include us or happen close enough to impact us.
Councilman Wan has represented ATL District 6 since 2010. He grew up on the area, and attended Clarkston High, GA Tech School of Engineering, and completed his MBA at U Penn. In addition to his Atlanta appointment, Mr. Wan also works as director of development for Emory University’s libraries. Mr. Wan clarified that at this meeting, he is representing the City of Atlanta and District 6 and that he is not part of the Emory governance team (that would handle any cityhood/annexation discussions). Extensive meeting notes follow.
Announcements by Lynn Ganim, acting MANA president:
This meeting is part of a series of meetings where MANA is reaching out to public officials to better understand how our neighborhood may be impacted by annexations or by new cities that include us or happen close enough to impact us.
- We have reached out to identify a County representative but have not been successful
- To learn about Commissioner Gannon’s Blueprint for DeKalb, attend Sept 30 meeting
- The interim CEO has appointed an operations task force that meets weekly at the Maloof Bldg; citizens are welcome to attend
- MANA’s Oct 7 meeting will feature Rep Mary Margaret Oliver, who has been closely involved with recent cityhood proposals and will explain the legislative process
- MANA will conduct a survey (house to house) to better understand our residents’ concerns and preferences
Councilman Wan has represented ATL District 6 since 2010. He grew up on the area, and attended Clarkston High, GA Tech School of Engineering, and completed his MBA at U Penn. In addition to his Atlanta appointment, Mr. Wan also works as director of development for Emory University’s libraries. Mr. Wan clarified that at this meeting, he is representing the City of Atlanta and District 6 and that he is not part of the Emory governance team (that would handle any cityhood/annexation discussions). Extensive meeting notes follow.
Update from the Druid Hills Charter Cluster
An update was posted by the Druid Hills Charter Cluster initiative earlier this week. Although state law requires that the refiled petition be taken up by the DeKalb County school board for their vote on approval or non-approval, agendas for board has over the past several months have noticeably avoided this task.
So... what to do? DHCC advocates are suggesting that if you would like to see the process move forward to an affirmative vote, consider sending a handwritten note. The most effective folks to lobby are probably board members who voted not to approve the petition initially but who will be rolling off the board and may be more willing to shift their thinking on the refiled petition (Ms. Karen Carter, Mr. David Campbell, and Dr. Michael Erwin). E-mail is also OK but these tend to get lost in inboxes and handwritten correspondence may stand out more. You might also consider copying Superintendent Thurmond on your correspondence so that he can develop a sense of community support for the initiative.
Handwritten notes can be sent to:
1701 Mountain Industrial Boulevard
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
E-mail addresses for board members can be found here.
So... what to do? DHCC advocates are suggesting that if you would like to see the process move forward to an affirmative vote, consider sending a handwritten note. The most effective folks to lobby are probably board members who voted not to approve the petition initially but who will be rolling off the board and may be more willing to shift their thinking on the refiled petition (Ms. Karen Carter, Mr. David Campbell, and Dr. Michael Erwin). E-mail is also OK but these tend to get lost in inboxes and handwritten correspondence may stand out more. You might also consider copying Superintendent Thurmond on your correspondence so that he can develop a sense of community support for the initiative.
Handwritten notes can be sent to:
1701 Mountain Industrial Boulevard
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
E-mail addresses for board members can be found here.
From DHCC:
As talk and organization around the concepts of new cities and annexation continue to grow, the Druid Hills Charter Cluster remains focused on one issue and one issue only: approval of the DHCC by the DeKalb Board of Education for the benefit of our seven cluster schools. It is true that approval or denial of the charter will have real implications for any cityhood or annexation efforts. In light of these growing discussions in our greater DHCC community, the DHCC would like all stakeholders and elected decision-makers to keep the following points in mind:
- DHCC has the support of all seven school councils and the communities they serve.
- DHCC represents the most diverse school population in DeKalb County.
- DHCC's Petition meets all the requirements of a conversion charter petition, as noted by DCSD and the State of Georgia.
- Charter clusters, such as the DHCC, keep all the local property tax dollars generated within a given high school zone in DeKalb County, and allow the value of those dollars to be allocated equally, on a per pupil basis, across DeKalb County. The creation of new school systems or the annexation of territory into an existing independent school system takes the local property tax dollars generated within that same high school zone out of the DeKalb County Board of Education's budget.
- Failure to approve the DHCC could result in some portion of the cluster tax base being annexed into the City of Atlanta, the City of Decatur, and/or incorporated by one or more new cities expected to be approved for referendum by the General Assembly in early 2015.
- DHCC provides a governance structure and petition commitment to improve the performance of ALL seven schools in the cluster.
- DHCC accepts 100% of all cluster resident students and available capacity is open to ALL DeKalb students by lottery. DHCC has no ability to exclude any student within its attendance zone and no ability to exclude any student from any where in DeKalb whose enrollment is determined by random lottery.
- DHCC includes new programs and enhancements to existing educational programs NOT available any where to current DeKalb students.
- Truly empowering school-house level principals and teachers with the flexibility, autonomy, and authority to determine the instructional pacing, curriculum, assessment methods, enrichment programs, and even daily and yearly calendars that best serve their students will result in greater professional satisfaction for our teachers, increased accountability, and sustained improvements in achievement and growth for ALL students.
- The cluster-level accountability that comes with flexibility and autonomy AND the expansion of school choice via the state-mandated, county-wide lottery that will be offered at each and every cluster school with capacity, will foster healthy and productive competition among our creative, dedicated principals and teachers, leading to better service to, and outcomes for, students throughout DeKalb County.
- DHCC follows precisely the funding rubric outlined by state law and, as a result, drives a much greater percentage of per pupil funds to classrooms and teachers than the status quo.
The DHCC is a good idea for all students within DeKalb and approving it is the right thing for the DeKalb Board of Education to do for DeKalb County students. Share your voice and your opinion with every official elected by residents of DeKalb County.
September views of the neighborhood
With the recent rains (and rains and rains), the Clyde Shepherd Nature Preserve pond actually gained some puddles....
And the mushroom season continues with plump, jolly mushrooms popping up everywhere. Prime real estate for smurfs!
And the mushroom season continues with plump, jolly mushrooms popping up everywhere. Prime real estate for smurfs!
Monday, September 15, 2014
Property tax scenarios for Medlock Park: it's complicated
As we all are well aware, our neighborhood sits in an area that is already seeing big changes. Commercial property development has really picked up in recent years (see our posts on Suburban Plaza, Scott Blvd Baptist Church and the Medline LCI study). We are made to understand that our unincorporated status likely will change as new cities are created or existing cities annex nearby areas.
We have been concerned about annexation plans for several years now, specifically about the lack of information about how annexations affect the County at large. Regardless of how many cities we have, the County is responsible for some services to cities, and for all services to unincorporated areas. When we think about a city having its own police force, we often forget that DeKalb County Police is still in the background, providing services such as aerial support, SWAT, and bomb units, among others. Local emergency planning may be in place, but the County Board of Health's comprehensive public health and emergency preparedness response infrastructure remains a necessity. New cities and annexations change all budgets but are discussed in terms of benefits to the smaller municipality: is this new city viable, does that existing city need this annexation to remain viable. We encourage DeKalb County to argue its case and explain how proposed cities and annexations impact the County's viability, too.
Property tax bills are of particular interest during periods of incorporation and annexation activity. When an area rescinds its unincorporated status (by annexing to an existing city or joining a newly formed city), there is a shift in which entities provide basic services. For unincorporated areas, all services are provided by the county. Cities, in turn, provide a subset of services and the formation of new cities is typically justified on those terms--the county is not doing well enough and local control will allow for better and more efficient services. When the responsibility for services shifts jurisdictions, the funds that support them must follow. Thus, when annexed, a property owner will go from having his or her property taxes levied by two entities (state and county) to three (state, county and city). If economies of scale apply, it may cost more for the smaller city to provide those services. However, if the quality of the services is (or is perceived to be) higher, the city may become more attractive relative to nearby unincorporated areas and property values will increase. Current and potential residents weigh the benefit of increased property values vs. increased property taxes (as well as other quality of life factors) to decide if the higher tax bill is worth it.
Change is the only constant when it comes to property taxes: home owners (who pay property taxes directly) and renters (who pay property taxes indirectly through their rents to landlords) must reconcile with this reality. Aggregate (total) property tax bills may change each year based on the interaction between
Side-by-side comparisons of potential property tax scenarios are hard to come by. The Medlock Park area faces three potential scenarios: remain unincorporated, join a new city or join an existing city. We cannot guess at the property tax scenario for a new city. Although the City of Briarcliff Vinson Feasibility study included Medlock Park and focused on whether the proposed city would be financially viable, it did not address what its millage rates or other fees might be.
We can, however, compare our unincorporated property tax bills to those for nearby Dekalb cities. Luckily for us, some helpful individuals have crunched Decatur and Atlanta numbers for us:
We have been concerned about annexation plans for several years now, specifically about the lack of information about how annexations affect the County at large. Regardless of how many cities we have, the County is responsible for some services to cities, and for all services to unincorporated areas. When we think about a city having its own police force, we often forget that DeKalb County Police is still in the background, providing services such as aerial support, SWAT, and bomb units, among others. Local emergency planning may be in place, but the County Board of Health's comprehensive public health and emergency preparedness response infrastructure remains a necessity. New cities and annexations change all budgets but are discussed in terms of benefits to the smaller municipality: is this new city viable, does that existing city need this annexation to remain viable. We encourage DeKalb County to argue its case and explain how proposed cities and annexations impact the County's viability, too.
Property tax bills are of particular interest during periods of incorporation and annexation activity. When an area rescinds its unincorporated status (by annexing to an existing city or joining a newly formed city), there is a shift in which entities provide basic services. For unincorporated areas, all services are provided by the county. Cities, in turn, provide a subset of services and the formation of new cities is typically justified on those terms--the county is not doing well enough and local control will allow for better and more efficient services. When the responsibility for services shifts jurisdictions, the funds that support them must follow. Thus, when annexed, a property owner will go from having his or her property taxes levied by two entities (state and county) to three (state, county and city). If economies of scale apply, it may cost more for the smaller city to provide those services. However, if the quality of the services is (or is perceived to be) higher, the city may become more attractive relative to nearby unincorporated areas and property values will increase. Current and potential residents weigh the benefit of increased property values vs. increased property taxes (as well as other quality of life factors) to decide if the higher tax bill is worth it.
Change is the only constant when it comes to property taxes: home owners (who pay property taxes directly) and renters (who pay property taxes indirectly through their rents to landlords) must reconcile with this reality. Aggregate (total) property tax bills may change each year based on the interaction between
- assessed property value and freezes,
- millage rates for different applicable jurisdictions (state, county and city millage rates are recalculated each year and may go up or down),
- applicable fees or service charges,
- tax credits (e.g. HOST) and
- potential exemptions that may vary by jurisdiction (e.g., owner occupancy, disability, senior, or veteran exemptions).
Side-by-side comparisons of potential property tax scenarios are hard to come by. The Medlock Park area faces three potential scenarios: remain unincorporated, join a new city or join an existing city. We cannot guess at the property tax scenario for a new city. Although the City of Briarcliff Vinson Feasibility study included Medlock Park and focused on whether the proposed city would be financially viable, it did not address what its millage rates or other fees might be.
We can, however, compare our unincorporated property tax bills to those for nearby Dekalb cities. Luckily for us, some helpful individuals have crunched Decatur and Atlanta numbers for us:
- The City of Decatur Tax Blog has a series of posts discussing how property taxes are levied by different municipalities. The focus of course is on City of Decatur taxes, but the discussion also sheds light on DeKalb County property taxes. Aggregate property tax rates fall in Decatur in 2014 challenges the idea that property tax rates inexorably go up each year. Comparing property taxes in Decatur and unincorporated DeKalb sheds light on misconceptions about how taxes are calculated depending on whether a property is in a city or not. Note that these numerical comparisons focus on properties without exemptions. UPDATES: Additionally, Property taxes including basic homestead exemptions in Decatur and DeKalb compares the impact of homestead vs. non-homstead exemptions and HOST credits. To download an Excel file that allows you to type in a property value and estimate City of Decatur taxes, click here.
- For a different take on the issue that compares property taxes for City of Atlanta vs. unincorporated DeKalb County, see Taxes in Unincorporated DeKalb versus Atlanta in DeKalb: An Annexation Briefing Paper, presented by the Druid Hills Civic Association. This comparison uses 2013 data and factors in exemption scenarios.
- To view a side-by-side comparison of a Medlock Park property vs a City of Decatur property (using 2012 data and showing actual, anonymized property bills), click here. That image is part of our June 2013 post titled Context for the city hood movement sweeping DeKalb County.
In trying to make sense of these comparisons, it is critical to understand that property tax bills are extremely specific to the individual. A commercial property is taxed differently from a residential property. Homestead exemptions are common and offer significant relief, but other individual exemptions can be difficult to calculate. Take for example senior exemptions: an individual may be eligible for several (county, city, sometimes both), individual income affects exemption eligibility, and each municipality calculates the exemption based on its own formulas (with exemptions applying to different parts of the municipality's budget). Individuals wishing to understand what senior exemption scenarios apply to them should first study applicable county/city websites. The next step would be to contact their property tax office, current tax bill AND projected income information in hand: property tax staff cannot provide an accurate estimate without this information. In general, the older the person, the more individualized the calculation.
We are currently trying to refine the above information to share a side-by-side comparison using homestead exemptions (vs. none) across unincorporated DeKalb, City of Atlanta and City of Decatur. Generally speaking, unincorporated DeKalb taxes are lowest, followed by City of Atlanta and then City of Decatur. We cannot know if these trends extend into the future without information from the County about how their millage rates may change due to proposed annexations and incorporations.
Community Meeting re: annexation to Atlanta [Sept 17]
Just a reminder! To see the original announcement with more information, see http://www.medlockpark.org/2014/09/community-meeting-with-atlanta.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





